The Relationship Between Vocabulary Exposure and Vocabulary Recognition Among EFL Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57983/kx9xm154Keywords:
Correlational Study, EFL Students, Vocabulary Exposure, Vocabulary RecognitionAbstract
Vocabulary mastery is essential for English language proficiency; however, limited classroom exposure continues to hinder EFL learners' lexical development. Given the growing role of digital media in language learning, this study investigates the relationship between extramural vocabulary exposure and vocabulary recognition among English Education students. Using a quantitative correlational design, data were collected from 20 students at Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar (2025/2026) through a questionnaire on vocabulary exposure via digital media and a multiple-choice vocabulary recognition test. Spearman Rank Correlation analysis revealed a strong, positive, and statistically significant relationship between vocabulary exposure and vocabulary recognition (r = 0.709, p < .001). The findings highlight the value of informal digital learning environments in fostering vocabulary acquisition beyond classroom instruction. This study contributes empirical evidence supporting the integration of autonomous, media-based vocabulary learning into EFL pedagogy, offering practical insights for educators seeking to strengthen students' lexical competence.
References
Alqahtani, M. (2015). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 3(3), 21–34.
Arndt, H. L., & Woore, R. (2018). Vocabulary learning from watching YouTube videos and reading blog posts. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 124–142.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Cahyono, B. Y., & Widiati, U. (2011). The teaching of English as a foreign language in Indonesia. Malang: State University of Malang Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143-188.
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Harlow: Longman.
Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning. Cognition and Instruction, 3(1), 1-26.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
Milton, J. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peters, E. (2018). The effect of out-of-class exposure to English language media on vocabulary knowledge. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 169(1), 142–168.
Renandya, W. A. (2012). Teacher roles in EIL. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 1(2), 65-80.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sundqvist, P. (2009). Extramural English matters: Out-of-school English and its impact on Swedish ninth graders' oral proficiency and vocabulary. Karlstad: Karlstad University Press.
Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Webb, S. (2010). Pre-learning low-frequency vocabulary in second language television programs. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 501–515.








